I was writing a piece about Ghana and reading about Nigeria at the same time, which is a habit that developed naturally over the months of running this publication, because what happens in Nigeria tends to arrive in Ghana the way weather systems do, slower than you expected, larger than you hoped, and carrying the specific kind of moisture that soaks through everything if you are not already inside. On April 17, 2026, Nigeria’s National Broadcasting Commission issued a formal notice to every broadcast station in the country, invoking Section 1.10.3 of the Nigeria Broadcasting Code, which prohibits presenters from expressing personal opinions on air, and I paused at the sentence where the Commission stated that it would enforce “strict and uncompromised compliance” with this provision as the 2027 general elections approach. The Commission had a strong view on this. They did not issue a notice about that. When Nigeria bans opinions from its broadcast landscape, west africa’s press freedom index shifts with it, not immediately, not visibly, but in the way a building settles when the ground beneath it compresses, steadily and in the specific direction the pressure has been pointing for several years now.
The Brewed Satire is, in its entirety, a publication that injects opinions into prose. We have been writing about the gap between how things are announced and how they are actually lived since February 2026, twice a week, without a broadcast regulator issuing a formal notice about it. This is not because the gap does not exist in Ghana. It is because Ghana, at 52 on the RSF Press Freedom Index, has not yet arrived at the place that Nigeria, at 122, arrived on April 17. The distance between those two numbers is not an abstraction. It is the distance between two governments that faced the same question about how a state relates to its broadcast landscape and answered it differently in the same week.
Nigeria Bans Broadcast Opinions: What the Code Actually Says
The NBC’s notice targeted a provision prohibiting presenters from passing personal views as fact, denying opposing views equitable airtime, or allowing discussions to tilt in favour of particular interests. The Commission described a “noticeable departure from established journalistic standards” among Nigerian broadcasters. It added, in the same paragraph, that this enforcement was being announced as Nigeria approaches its 2027 general elections, which is not a journalistic standard but is the most revealing sentence in the document.
We have seen this film before. In 2022, the NBC fined DStv, Trust TV, NTA-Startimes, and TSTV a combined N20 million for airing the BBC Africa Eye documentary “Bandits: Warlords of Zamfara,” which examined armed banditry in Nigeria’s north. The Commission said the documentary glorified the activities of bandits. Trust TV said it aired the piece because armed banditry is a documented national emergency and informing the public about it is the function of journalism. In 2023, Channels Television was fined N5 million for airing an interview with the Labour Party’s vice-presidential candidate during the election period, on the grounds that the broadcast was “capable of inciting disorder.” An opposition candidate giving an interview on a private television station is, in Nigeria’s regulatory framework, a form of disorder. This framework has not changed. It has been formally restated with less than a year to go before the next election.
The Commission That Issued an Opinion About Opinions
The formal notice that prohibits the expression of personal opinions is, in its structure and its argument, an expression of personal opinion. The Commission decided, without a court order and without a hearing, that Nigerian broadcasters had departed from established journalistic standards. That is a judgment. A judgment is a position. A position is an opinion. The Commission issued this particular opinion about opinions through the official channel of a formal notice that was read and reported by the broadcasters who are now required to operate without them.
The Commission’s own language describes the problem as presenters who “inject personal opinions into programmes.” The word inject suggests contamination, as though an opinion introduced into a news broadcast is a foreign substance entering a clean system, a problem rather than the purpose. The clean system the Commission is protecting is one in which the news arrives without the weight of meaning anything to the person delivering it, in which balance is achieved not by ensuring that competing positions receive a fair hearing but by ensuring that the presenter’s position on those competing positions is not visible. This is, by any fair assessment, a position. The Commission would like every broadcaster in Nigeria to hold it without expressing a view about what it means. They issued a notice to that effect.
This lands in your inbox every Tuesday and Friday.
Subscribe free — no noise, just the satire
What Amnesty, SERAP, and Section 39 Said About It
Amnesty International described the directive as “authoritarian and unconstitutional.” The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project issued a 48-hour ultimatum to President Tinubu to withdraw the notice, citing Section 39 of Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution, which guarantees freedom of expression and which SERAP argues cannot be overridden by a broadcasting code. The Nigeria Union of Journalists called the directive “a veiled attempt to gag the media and institutionalise censorship.”
Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar stated that the NBC “resorts to heavy-handed directives whenever elections approach.” This is a personal opinion. It was expressed on air. It was expressed on air in the specific week during which the NBC said that personal opinions should not be expressed on air.
A broadcaster who is uncertain whether a question she asks on air constitutes an “injection of personal opinion” is a broadcaster who will ask fewer questions. Self-censorship does not require enforcement. It requires only the credible possibility of enforcement, and the NBC’s track record of N5 million fines for documentary journalism and electoral interviews provides that credibility in considerable and specific detail.
The Numbers West Africa Has Stopped Watching
The RSF World Press Freedom Index placed Nigeria at 122 out of 180 countries in 2025, down ten places from the previous year. Ghana ranked 52, down from 50. Those movements are small in absolute terms. What matters is the direction, and the direction across West Africa in 2025 was consistent: eleven of the region’s sixteen countries declined in the same year. Guinea fell 31 places. Burkina Faso fell nineteen. Ivory Coast fell eleven. Four countries improved. Four out of sixteen.
The pattern of democratic retreat disguised as regulatory tidying is one Ghana has watched arrive at larger neighbours before, and the precedent for abandoning stated commitments to open information when elections approach is not confined to West Africa.
What It Means That This Publication Still Runs
The Brewed Satire is a Ghanaian satirical publication. It runs on the condition that Ghana still allows a Ghanaian writer to publish opinions twice a week without a formal notice from a broadcast regulator arriving in response. That condition currently holds. It holds because Ghana is at 52 and not 122, because navigating Ghana’s political landscape still leaves room for the observation that the gap exists, and because the specific kind of opinion this publication produces has not yet been classified as an injection of personal views into a programme.
The classification can happen. It happens when elections are close enough and the code provisions sufficiently vague that the credible possibility of enforcement becomes indistinguishable from enforcement itself. Nigeria arrived at that point on April 17. The directive formalised it, and formalisation is what turns a possibility into a policy, and a policy into a practice, and a practice into the silence that settles over a broadcast studio in an election year when a presenter decides that the question she was about to ask is probably, on balance, better left unasked.
The Compliance Is the Opinion
When the 2027 elections arrive, Nigeria’s broadcast landscape will be balanced. The news will be delivered in the clean voice of someone who has no position on what it means. The anchors will be professional. The studios will be orderly. Somewhere in Lagos a presenter will sit down in front of a camera with a story about something actively terrible, and the ON AIR light will go red, and the story will arrive in living rooms across Nigeria in the voice of someone who has, per the Commission’s instruction, no view about it whatsoever. The opinions will be somewhere else, circulating on WhatsApp and X, in the specifically Nigerian form of voice note and group chat where the commentary that cannot be broadcast has always eventually ended up anyway.
What the NBC has achieved, in the strict regulatory sense, is a broadcast environment in which the presenter’s silence about what the news means is indistinguishable from objectivity. The silence is complete. The silence is compliant. The silence is also an editorial position—the one that says the facts carry no meaning that a journalist should be trusted to explain, held by a regulator that decided, on behalf of the listening public and ahead of an election, that this was the correct position to take. The Commission would prefer you did not notice that the decision was itself an injection of personal opinion into a programme. They did not issue a notice about it.
The Brewed Satire.
Share via
Tags
